malaki
V I P
There’s something seriously wrong with the current media landscape in Canada.
Why are they so soft on the Trudeau government?
Why are so-called journalists much more critical of Trudeau’s political opponents?
Why do media outlets often repeat Liberal talking points in their news coverage?
We saw this during the Freedom Convoy.
It was clear from the start, as trucks began making their way to Ottawa to protest government lockdowns and mandates, Prime Minister Trudeau didn’t want to deal with them.
So he labelled the entire protest as “fringe,” “hateful” and “far-right.”
Almost immediately, the legacy media took their cues from Trudeau and began writing numerous stories smearing the Convoy in any way possible.
By the time the truckers arrived in Ottawa, the narrative was set: these were hateful, radical, MAGA-funded, far-right, racists and yes – even Nazis.
Of course, none of this was true.
The Convoy consisted of freedom-loving Canadians who simply wanted change.
And the protest was peaceful – and even featured bouncy castles and hot tubs!
Why couldn't the legacy media cover the protests honestly and fairly?
Could this perhaps have something to do with government funding?
The media landscape in Canada has drastically changed in the last few years.
Legacy media outlets have become reliant on government handouts in order to stay afloat – and the government knows this.
Millions of taxpayer dollars are going to outlets like the CBC, Postmedia, the Toronto Star and more.
How can these outlets remain neutral and fair? How would they react if a politician threatened to pull their funding?
Copied from a 'True North'. publication.
Why are they so soft on the Trudeau government?
Why are so-called journalists much more critical of Trudeau’s political opponents?
Why do media outlets often repeat Liberal talking points in their news coverage?
We saw this during the Freedom Convoy.
It was clear from the start, as trucks began making their way to Ottawa to protest government lockdowns and mandates, Prime Minister Trudeau didn’t want to deal with them.
So he labelled the entire protest as “fringe,” “hateful” and “far-right.”
Almost immediately, the legacy media took their cues from Trudeau and began writing numerous stories smearing the Convoy in any way possible.
By the time the truckers arrived in Ottawa, the narrative was set: these were hateful, radical, MAGA-funded, far-right, racists and yes – even Nazis.
Of course, none of this was true.
The Convoy consisted of freedom-loving Canadians who simply wanted change.
And the protest was peaceful – and even featured bouncy castles and hot tubs!
Why couldn't the legacy media cover the protests honestly and fairly?
Could this perhaps have something to do with government funding?
The media landscape in Canada has drastically changed in the last few years.
Legacy media outlets have become reliant on government handouts in order to stay afloat – and the government knows this.
Millions of taxpayer dollars are going to outlets like the CBC, Postmedia, the Toronto Star and more.
How can these outlets remain neutral and fair? How would they react if a politician threatened to pull their funding?
Copied from a 'True North'. publication.