Is it just me or has anyone else seen an increase in users taking RARBG files and tagging them as their own? I downloaded multiple x265 releases from several different posts here and VLC and the metadata clearly show it tagged as an RARBG release, but that's not what they're posting it as.
I've seen it here and other places as well. I know RARBG is gone, but it just seems wrong that users are trying to take credit for encodes they clearly didn't do simply to build their rep.
I've seen it here and other places as well. I know RARBG is gone, but it just seems wrong that users are trying to take credit for encodes they clearly didn't do simply to build their rep.
