Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Google Removes ‘Pirate’ URLs from Users’ Privately Saved Links

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ernesto Van der Sar
  • Start date Start date
E

Ernesto Van der Sar

googlesaved
For many people, Google is the go-to starting point when they need to find something on the web. With just a few keystrokes, the search engine can find virtually anything.

The company also has many other tools to browse and organize the web, including the Chrome browser and YouTube.

All these products and services fall under the umbrella of the company Alphabet. While the various departments are largely run separately, there is plenty of overlap too. This week, we stumbled upon information suggesting that DMCA notices, received for the search engine, directly impact people’s privately saved links.

As reported earlier this month, Google’s search index is a prime target for copyright holders. Over the past several years, more than seven billion ‘infringing’ URLs have been flagged, with the majority removed. This makes sense, as Google is legally required to process DMCA takedown requests.

What comes as a surprise, however, is that the search takedown requests also impact other Google services.

Search Takedowns Affect Saved URLs​


A few hours ago, Eddie Roosenmaallen shared an email from Google, notifying him that a link had been removed from his Google Saved collection because it violates Google’s policy.

The reason cited for the removal is the “downstream impact”, as the URL in question is “blocked by Google Search”.

“The following saved item in one of your collections was determined to violate Google’s policy. As a result, the item will be moderated..,” Google writes, pointing out a defunct KickassTorrents domain as the problem.

saved-google.jpg


Initially, it was suggested that this removal impacted Google’s synched Chrome bookmarks but further research reveals that’s not the case. Instead, the removals apply to Google’s saved feature.

This Google service allows users to save and organize links, similar to what Pinterest does. These link collections can be private or shared with third parties.

Bookmarks?​


The initial bookmark confusion is likely caused by the fact that, in Google’s app, the saved icon (shown below) appears by default. When clicked, the page in question is added to a “favorite pages” collection, which some people see as a bookmark.

google saved


Confusing terminology aside, what stands out here is that Google’s search content policy also applies to these saved links. As a result, URLs for which Google receives a search takedown, disappear from saved collections as well. This applies to both public and private collections.

search-saved.jpg


DMCA’d URLS can’t be Saved​


TorrentFreak was able to replicate this issue. Google doesn’t allow us to ‘save’ URLs that are removed from Google search, such as YouTube ripper “Yout.com”, torrent site “1337x.to”, or the earlier mentioned “Katcr.com.”

These blockades apply to single URLs, not entire domains. For example, thepiratebay.org is still visible in Google searches and can be added to a collection. However, Pirate Bay links that are deindexed, such as this one, can’t be saved.

The same applies to other sites. The old homepage of YouTube ripper 2conv.com can’t be saved since it’s been removed from Google search, but the latest homepage URL (2conv.com/neshq) can still be added.

It’s not clear why Google enforces the search policy for saved links or whether preventing copyright infringement is the main goal. The company didn’t immediately respond to our request for comment. If we hear back, this article will be updated accordingly.

For now, the impact is relatively limited as the saved feature isn’t widely used. However, if Google decides to “moderate” users’ Chrome bookmarks, or its DNS resolver, things could get interesting.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
 
Google will be telling us how we should think next, or perhaps this is part of that... A good reason to ditch Chrome.
 
I don't use google nor chrome :) So I don't give a fig....google ain't your friend and they said they didn't want to play god on the net and look what they are doing....Playing god...fcking liars just like WEF, UN, EU, WHO, pretty much every leader of a country and the opposition....
 
Droid often mentions that he uses Opera. I use browsers for different tasks - Chrome set up specifically for killing dead topics, Edge (which is nothing special) for browsing the forum, FF used to be my go-to but I had issues with it (perhaps plug-in related but I only use that occasionally such as if I am having script issues and use FF for testing).
On Android I am currently testing Brave which is Chromium based. I am using it for reading some news sources for free without plug-ins.
As for Google alternatives, I can't say that I like any really much (eg DuckDuckGo) and often gravitate back to Google. Realistically, forums such DW and others act as a decent source of recommendations for a whole host of things and sources.
 
Thanks Frisbee for your quick reply and suggestions. I was thinking of trying out FF or Brave but I might also see of Droid has anything else to add.

I've tried DuckDuckGo as well but find I get up back with Google as the results are must better.
 
Just to throw it in the ring, I use Waterfox and have no problems accessing anything on the forum at all. There are a very few sites on the web that Waterfox can't handle and for those I use Edge.
 
Thank you NR for your input, it's much appreciated :)
 
I only use Opera and that's it....edge has been disabled (its part of the microsoft family and I don't trust microsoft after I found out that they use keyloggers etc in win 10), firefox uses too many resources and I think that's why NR used Waterfox. Chrome has never been used by me nor IE....
 
Thank you Droid, much appreciated :)
 
Back
Top